Financial Data
Updated 26 Jul 2017


Should you insist on the right to suspend works for non-payment?

Late payments can have problematic effects on construction contractors. Can you suspend works for non-payment? Can you do so before it is too late?


Natalie Reyneke, 17 February 2017  Share  0 comments  Print


All the answers to your unique business lifestage questions

Construction contracts are far more complex than in other sectors because the risks which could impact on the successful delivery of a project are so broad. Whereas in other sectors sellers or service providers are paid upon delivery of goods, construction contracts run over many months and it is therefore not feasible for any entity to carry the costs of executing only to be paid at completion.

Late payment by an employer can have devastating consequences for a contractor’s business. The standard form construction contracts recognise this and in most cases, they provide the contractor with the ability to suspend or slow down the works should payment not be received on the specified due date.

Related: Why correct communication is important in a construction contract

While there are other remedies available (such as charging interest on outstanding amounts) in practice I have rarely seen a contractor claim this entitlement to interest. It is much more effective to have the ability to potentially delay the employer’s project, especially given that this delay would be at the employer’s expense too.

Know your contract’s limitations

Standard construction contracts include interim payment provisions – usually payment for work done to date. Typically, a payment certificate is required to entitle the contractor, but this doesn’t guarantee that the employer will make payment timeously.

However, there are certain traps that contractors should be aware of. The most obvious snare is if the employer simply deletes the clauses from the contract that entitle the contractor to suspend the works. Quite simply, if there is no right to suspend written into the contract, you cannot do so.

The next trap is a ‘pay-when-paid’ clause between contractors and subcontractors. The difficulty that arises is that the due date for payment cannot be specified. It follows then that the point at which the subcontractor would be entitled to suspend works cannot be identified either.

Clause 31.15 of the JBCC Principal Building Agreement (July 2007) allows the contractor to give three working days’ notice to suspend works if payment has not been made or if a payment certificate is not issued. This, in turn, gives rise to an entitlement to an extension to the date for practical completion, with costs (Clause 29.2.12).

Related: The relationship between your main construction contract and a subcontract

That’s a pretty powerful remedy if you ask me. The majority of smaller contractors I work with are unaware of this clause in the JBCC suite of contracts.

My final bit of advice is not to discard all of your remedies when negotiating a contract. They are there for a reason and if your employer insists on taking these remedies away from you, make sure you have a back-up plan. Cash is king, after all.

Rate It12345rating

About the author


Natalie Reyneke

Natalie Reyneke was admitted as an Attorney in 2004. She is Senior Associate at MDA Consulting, a specialist commercial advisory practice in the construction environment. Natalie specialises in construction and engineering claims, contracts and dispute resolution. Her experience covers a broad range of both contentious and non-contentious issues in the construction and engineering industries. Her areas of expertise include all aspects of claims, contract and documentation drafting, all major forms of dispute resolution as well as legal advice and forensic audits of construction contracts.

Introducing the construction sector advice for new entrants

Are you about to make your mark on the construction industry? Brett Webb shares his advice for anyone entering the industry & what you should look out for.

Login to comment